- Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) has introduced a four-page healthcare reform bill which would simply allow anyone who want it to buy into Medicare. A nice idea, but do we really need more healthcare bills at this point? (Down with Tyranny)
- Charlie Crist demands to know if Senate primary opponent Marco Rubio has purchased back wax, because that would be totally gay not fiscally responsible. (CNN)
- When I was little, I figured we’d eventually come up with cars that drive themselves. Unfortunately, this Toyota Prius is not quite preforming the way I’d hoped. (Detroit Free Press)
- Now ex-Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY) admits he was doing all kinds of groping of his staff, except for the sexual kind! Yep, only doing that non-sexual groping… (LA Times)
- Visiting Pakistani legislators were not pleased that they were racially profiled at our airports, especially after they went and caught basically the whole Taliban for us. (NYTO
Archive for posts ‘racial profiling’
|
- Exciting news, America! Alleged human and former Vice President Dick Cheney will not run for president. However, Palin/Beck 2012, also. (Dallas Morning News/Newsmax)
- Oklahoma State Sen. Steve Russell (R-OK City) would like his state to opt-out of federal hate crime laws which currently infringe on his right to beat up gay people because of their gayness. (Oklahoma Daily)
- Former Gov. Tommy Thompson (R-WI) is interested in running for an office! Maybe for governor, or senator, or mayor of some little town. He doesn’t much care so long as the obviously fake name “Tommy Thompson” is on the ballot somewhere! (Political Wire)
- Oh look, your United States Senate can actually agree on something, specifically that Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) is really, really frickin’ old. Bipartisanship! (CNN Political Ticker)
- Sarah Palin has a clever idea to make Muslims not hate us anymore: religious profiling of all Muslims, to protect “innocent American lives” of the Christian variety. (TPM Live Wire)
Airport Security for the Rich and Airport Security for the Rest
DailyKos diarist grettadog got me thinking this morning about some pretty shady stuff that goes on at airports.
As usual I arrived early for my flight out to go through the ritual of undressing my feet, shuffling my laptop and emptying my pockets. Even though my flight was sheduled [sic] to leave at 7:30 AM, I thought it would be prudent to arrive at the airport at 4:30 to leave enough time for this process. It turned out to be a good guess. The line stretched for some 400′ as it routed back on itself twice. There were two screeners checking IDs at the end of the line to disperse us into the security check equipment. After nearly 2 hours in this line, we came to the TSA screener who was looking at IDs and boarding passes. Each screener was working two lines. As we got closer to the screener, I noticed a curious thing about her station. She was sharing time between two lines, but the other line (the line I was not in) was for first class passengers. I looked back at my line to ensure it did not shrink – nope, some 400 people lined up behind me. The first class line had about 10. And worse, the screener would actually process more first class passengers at a time. That is, she would spend time issuing through three or four first class for each coach passenger. This means the line is not only shorter, but if you are in the longer line, you are treated as though there are four other lines shared with your screener. So, we asked, in the most polite way, how is it that we ended up waiting. Her response – “guess you got in the wrong line”…
I’ve seen this happening at airports I fly through, but when I read about grettadog’s experience I had an epiphany: why hasn’t this ever bothered me before? It is completely incomprehensible that, in a country whose leaders are obsessed with keeping the public in constant fear of a terrorist attack, certain people are given preferential treatment in the security screening that is intended to protect us from “the next attack” solely on the basis of their wealth. We are told that standing in line at airport security is a sacrifice we have to make for our protection, so how come some people don’t have to make that sacrifice? Sure, they have the money to pay, but don’t terrorists also have money? How else did they pay for their food, their lodgings, their flight lessons, their guns? How can the federal government justify preferential treatment while it’s telling us that everyone’s lives–rich and poor–are at stake?
Call me cynical, but there’s only possible justification I can think of. Creating one airport security for the rich and one airport security for the rest of us in the epitome of George W. Bush’s America. His agenda is, and always has been, to make the rich richer and the poor poorer. What better place to exemplify the increasing class divide than at the airport security line?
There’s already one group of Americans whose members are treated like third-class citizens at the airport–the evidence that the TSA engages in racial profiling is clear. So here’s a brain-buster for the TSA: what should they do if a man with dark skin or (gasp!) a turban ends up in the first-class line? Do they treat him like a first-class American passenger or a freedom-hating Islamofascist?
UK Minister Detained at Dulles
Shahid Malik, UK International Development Minister and Britain’s first Muslim minister, was detained at Dulles Airport by Homeland Security and searched for explosives. Yes, an official representative of a foreign government was searched because he is Muslim, but that’s not even the whole story:
International development minister Shahid Malik was returning to the UK yesterday morning after attending a series of meetings on tackling terrorism when was stopped and searched at Dulles Airport in Washington DC.
The MP for Dewsbury was detained by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – the same department whose representatives he had been meeting on his visit to the country.
…Mr Malik said he was particularly annoyed, as a similar incident happened to him last year, when he was detained for an hour at JFK airport in New York by the DHS.
This was despite the fact he had been a keynote speaker at an event organised by the department, alongside the FBI and Muslim organisations in New York.
It doesn’t matter that Mr. Malik is a member of the British Cabinet. It doesn’t matter that he was in this country to meet with Homeland Security. It doesn’t matter that DHS had already made this mistake already. Mr. Malik was treated like a terrorist because he is a Muslim.
Mr Malik said yesterday: “After a few minutes a couple of other people were also taken to one side. We were all Muslims – the other two were black Muslims, both with Muslim names.”
When is someone in Congress going to speak up about this government-sanctioned racial profiling? Is it legal to stop every dark-skinned person for the oh-so-suspicious action of being in an airport? Does it really make America safer to check every Muslim for bombs before they get on a plane?
|
Search
RSS FeedArchives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007